[ad_1]
Dan
Hooker started his profession at featherweight, however after an
unsuccessful return to 145 kilos in March, it feels like he’ll be
competing at light-weight for the foreseeable future.
Hooker is coming off a first-round technical knockout loss to
Arnold
Allen in a featherweight bout at UFC Battle Night time 204 in London
on March 19. That transfer got here on the heels of a stretch during which he
misplaced three of 4 light-weight appearances. In the end, Hooker
determined the trouble wanted to make 145 kilos wasn’t value it.
“I felt like I may’ve stayed at 145, however clearly a number of
sacrifice goes into that,” Hooker mentioned on Submission Radio.
“However off of the results of the final struggle, after which I really feel like I’m
in the very same place at each weight lessons – so why not? Why
would I make the additional sacrifice? The additional sacrifice was to get me
again in the identical place that I used to be in. what I imply? However
if I’m in the very same place, I’d slightly be in the very same
place and consuming and having a slice of cake each now and
then.”
With losses in 4 of his final 5 Octagon appearances, Hooker
doesn’t essentially have his subsequent opponent in thoughts. Nonetheless, he
expects it’ll inevitably be a tough matchup, whoever it’d
be.
“It’ll be whoever it’s going to be,” Hooker mentioned. “Clearly I’ve
my inklings, however it’ll be like all these different conditions. You run
again and also you take a look at who I’ve fought, you simply take a look at the division
and ask your self, who don’t folks need to struggle? And that’s who
I’ll most likely find yourself combating.
“Like, who’s getting turned down left, proper and heart? That’s who
I’ll struggle subsequent. So you’ll be able to check out the division. Ask
your self, ‘Who doesn’t anybody need to struggle?’ That’s the man.
That’s why I’m not that fussed about. I can get again within the combine. I
can get again within the combine in a heartbeat. You possibly can’t depend a canine like
me out of the sport. That’s simply not the way it works.”
[ad_2]
Source link
